Heat shield cleared; Shannon talks night launches, Hubble
BY WILLIAM HARWOOD
STORY WRITTEN FOR CBS NEWS "SPACE PLACE" & USED WITH PERMISSION
Posted: September 12, 2006
NASA's Mission Management Team today gave the shuttle Atlantis' heat shield a clean bill of health, formally clearing the ship and its crew for a normal re-entry Sept. 20 if no other problems develop.
MMT Chairman John Shannon said an exhaustive review of space- and ground-based imagery, wing leading edge sensor data and laser scans in orbit normally takes five days to complete. But this time around, the work was done in half the time, thanks to the performance of Atlantis' external tank and the team's increasing familiarity with post-Columbia inspection procedures.
"We were able to clear all of the thermal protection system in 60 hours," Shannon said. "My best estimate was always five days, so we did it in half the time. That just shows how much better the processes are getting and the people are getting at running through the processes."
As it turns out, it wasn't a gap filler at all.
"It was kind of a curious thing, when they started looking at the installation records, they had no record there was a gap filler in that location," Shannon said. "That caused them to be a little bit curious and they went and looked at the baseline (pre-launch) imagery and there wasn't a gap filler installed in that area."
On closer inspection, engineers realized what appeared to be part of a gap filler sticking up from the surrounding tile was actually part of a plastic shim, used during tile installation to ensure proper spacing. Shims are removed after use but this one apparently was missed.
The exposed shim, Shannon said, "is not an issue at all. It's sticking out just a little bit. Since it is plastic, it will melt very easily. They ran a test on it, it'll soften at about 250 degrees Fahrenheit and it melts at about 450 degrees Fahrenheit and it will see that melting environment seven minutes before we hit Mach 25. So before we really hit the sensible atmosphere, that piece of shim stock will be long gone. So we are not worried about it."
Just to be safe, engineers carried out an analysis that assumed the shim was, in fact, a gap filler. The results showed Atlantis could safely enter as is even in that case. Two other protruding gap fillers were spotted earlier but neither poses a threat.
As for the suspect insulation blanket on the shuttle's right-side orbital maneuvering system pod, Shannon said closer inspection using a camera on the space station showed it was not a problem and Atlantis was cleared for a normal re-entry.
One final heat shield inspection will be conducted after Atlantis undocks from the space station to make sure no orbital debris or micrometeoroids hit the spacecraft after it reached orbit.
On another front, Shannon said he is optimistic NASA will be able to resume night launchings in December when the next space station assembly mission is scheduled for liftoff.
"The team overall does feel extremely confident about launching at night," he said. "The radar that we have, we got another test of it this flight, and it worked extremely well for us. We also think we'll get some good imagery still just from the backlighting form the solid rocket boosters. So we're feeling good about the night launch.
"What you might lose for a night launch is further understanding of the external tank or the solid rocket boosters or the environment that we're flying in. Launching at night does not impact the safety of that crew, because we're going to do the full inspection just like we did on this flight. So, all you would lose launching at night is additional information about the environment that you might apply to ... future shuttle missions. It will not affect, though, the safety of the crew that actually launches at night. So we're feeling very comfortable that we could do that."
Shannon also said he was optimistic about eventual approval of flight to service the Hubble Space Telescope. NASA Administrator Mike Griffin is expected to make a decision one way or the other in October.
But a Hubble flight would not be able to take advantage of the space station as a safe haven in the event of non-repairable heat shield problems - the two spacecraft are in different orbits - and it may not be possible to launch a second shuttle on a rescue mission.
Shannon said he was heartened by the continued good performance of the external tank, by ongoing work to improve the tank's insulation and by development of heat shield repair techniques. But a second shuttle launch pad may not be available even if a second ship could be processed in parallel for a rescue mission and a Hubble repair crew might have to rely on their own ability to inspect the shuttle and carry out repairs, if necessary.
"A lot of things are lining up that says Hubble is going to be a doable kind of thing," Shannon said. "The real question on Hubble is going to be the launch on need, because that's going to be extremely difficult to do. You just don't have the orbital lifetime on a Hubble mission to be able to get another vehicle launched. It's going to be very tough.
"So we're going to have to go into the Hubble decision not counting on the launch-on-need vehicle. And that's the difficult question the agency's going to have to do. Do we have enough confidence in the design, do we have enough confidence in our inspection and repair to be able to do that? And I think that's where the discussion is mostly going to lie."
The official crew patch for the STS-115 mission of space shuttle Atlantis to resume orbital construction of the International Space Station.
Choose your store:
U.S. - U.K. - E.U. - Worldwide