The spacecraft is now in its 130th orbit, in good status and all its functions are performing nominally. As in previous weeks, the spacecraft was operated in electric propulsion mode almost continuously. We have however experienced three flame-outs.

As reported earlier, the cause of the problem has been identified and a procedure to automatically detect these events and restart the engine autonomously was prepared. The procedure will be uploaded to the on-board software this week. Despite the fact that the solar activity at the moment is considerably reduced, from the occurrence of the events, we suspect that the density of trapped protons at low altitudes of the radiation belts is still quite high and is causing the flame-outs. We have therefore decided not to thrust when the spacecraft's altitude is below 10 000 km.

The total cumulated thrust time is now more than 810 hours and we have consumed almost 13 kg of Xenon. With this little fuel consumption the electric propulsion engine has so far provided a velocity increment of about 567 ms-1 (equivalent to more than 2000 kmh-1). The electric propulsion engine's performance, periodically monitored by means of the telemetry data transmitted by the spacecraft and by radio-tracking by the ground stations, continues to show a small over performance in thrust, varying from 1.3% to 1.8% over this period.

As of the 28th of November we have changed the thrust direction strategy. So far we have been thrusting in the direction of the velocity vector, tangentially to the orbit. This direction maximises the increase of the semi-major axis, causing both the perigee and the apogee altitudes to increase. This optimal strategy leads to quite a high apogee at the end of the radiation escape phase, which is good because it brings SMART-1 closer to the Moon. The downside of this strategy is that it causes the spacecraft to transit around apogee for longer periods of time.

When in mid March 2004 the apogee will be in the ecliptic plane, the spacecraft will transit several times for more than 2 hours through the shadow produced by the Earth. In order to avoid such a situation, which the spacecraft has not been designed for, we have decided to change the thrust strategy. We now thrust in a direction perpendicular to the position vector in the orbital plane.

This new strategy produces a faster perigee increase, and will lead to an earlier escape from the radiation belts and a lower apogee height. With a lower apogee height, the spacecraft will transit at higher speeds through the Earth's shadow cone and it will be eclipsed for a maximum of 2 hours.

Once substantially outside the radiation belts (at a perigee height of 20 000 km), thrusting will be performed only at perigee for short periods to tune the apogee height to match the maximum allowable eclipse duration, which is currently under evaluation. This new strategy entails to have in about one month many coast arcs (parts of the orbit when there is no thrust) of considerable duration. These will be used to perform instrument commissioning and preliminary scientific observations.

The degradation of the electrical power produced by the solar arrays has been much less over the last week than it used to be previously. As a matter of fact the power available has remained more or less constant over the last 9 days. This means that the degradation by radiation has matched the increase of solar irradiance of about 0.4 %, so that the net effect on the power produced is nil. This is explained by the fact that no direct proton radiation by solar activity was experienced and the fact that the spacecraft stays outside the radiation belts for a considerable part of the time in its current orbit.

The communication, data handling and on-board software subsystems have been performing very well in this period. In particular the counted number of the single event upsets corrected by the processor EDAC system is drastically decreasing. We are now at a rate of two or three events per day.

The thermal subsystem continues also to perform well and all the temperatures are as expected. The reported problem of the high temperature of the star trackers optical heads has been investigated further through detailed in-orbit observations. We are now starting a ground simulation campaign to correlate the in-orbit data with the thermal mathematical models. The situation is under control and more on this will be reported as soon as available.